By Mike Donovan
RUSSELL– Seepage of pollutants into the Westfield River continued undetected until this past summer when historically low water levels revealed stained rocks and soil, and pools with an “oily sheen” on the surface, according to a group of residents who are asking town officials to take action. The group has met with the selectboard, planning board and conservation commission to urge them to take action. One solution would be to call in the spill response team of the Superfund, a member of the group, Ruth Kennedy, told the planning board last week. “We’re looking for help,” she said.
Previously, Russell resident, John Berry, told the selectboard that he noticed the staining on rocks below the former Westfield River Paper Company dam and notified other members of the group, who arranged with Spectrum Analytical, Inc., of Agawam, for testing. The company provided the special containers for the samples and the specimens were collected in a professional manner, according to Ed Ziskowski, a Westfield resident.
The group members were also skeptical of testing carried out for the state Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) by the Westfield engineering firm, Tighe and Bond, and criticized methods employed by another engineering firm, Huntley Associates, of Northampton. Huntley had found reportable levels of cancer-causing PCBs in two of five “lagoons,” or settling bays, that the paper company once used for treatment of waste water from its mill, and lower levels in the other bays. Huntley averaged out the results in all five of the bays tested, which resulted in an acceptable level. Kennedy, however, feels the firm should have reported the higher readings separately.
The maximum level is 2.000 and actual levels were 2.185 and 2.308 at the high end, and 284, 256 and 313 for the other three lagoons tested, yielding an average of 1.069—“significantly” below the standard, according the Huntley’s report on the testing.
Tighe and Bond, the group said, tested in the wrong areas and at the wrong times—in May, when the water was high, and in September, after significant rainfall had raised the water level.
Spectrum also found high levels of arsenic, cadmium and iron, in the group’s water samples, according to John Ziskowski, who has a BS degree in chemistry and is a retired fishery biologist for the federal National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). He is Ed Ziskowski’s brother and is contributing his expertise to the group.
John Ziskowski said the permissible level for arsenic is .01 parts per million (ppm), and for cadmium, .0002 ppm. For iron, he said, the permissible level is 1.0 ppm. The arsenic samples tested at .0235, the cadmium at .0032, and iron at 83.8 ppm.
Ed Ziskowski later disputed claims that the extremely high level of iron contamination is harmless, saying it impacts fish and other aquatic wildlife by reducing the river water’s oxygen content. “All three (pollutants) are taking oxygen from the water,” he said.
He said that Spectrum also found high concentrations of those and other metals in the soil samples the group provided—barium, chromium and lead.
He added that tests also detected high levels of e-coli, coliform and enterococci bacteria, that may come from septic waste dumping in the area of the “seep” (where the samples were taken). Ed Ziskowski was skeptical that the bacteria came from the town’s waste water treatment plant, noting it’s on the opposite side of the river. He suspects there might have been a sewer line or septic system in the area. “If that level of e-coli were found in a lake it would be closed,” he said.
John Ziskowski noted that the presence of barium, a radioactive substance related to radium, is somewhat surprising.
“There may be a natural radium deposit in the area,” he said, adding that high levels of sodium were also unexpected. “The elevated levels of sodium…are strange and deserving of further investigation,” he wrote in his report. “They may be the result of leakage of caustic soda or sodium hydroxide from the sludge lagoon site.”
Most of the pollutants allegedly found at the site were on the property of Indian River Hydro, a company rebuilding a hydroelectric power station there. Bill Fay, president of Swift River Hydro, connected with Indian River, said the company is perfectly aware of the pollutants on the property. They’ve been monitored regularly since it took over the site in 2004, he said, and the conditions are improving. “We’re constantly monitoring and the bad stuff is going down, down, down,” he said.
According to Fay, the DEP reduced the frequency of the monitoring due to the improving conditions. The site was being monitored twice a year but DEP changed that to once a year until the citizens group’s current complaints. “Now we’re back to twice a year,” Fay said, “and that monitoring isn’t cheap.”
Indian River Vice President Dave Hobbs said he received the results last Thursday of the recent testing by Tighe and Bond, and the levels were similar to Spectrum’s but did not indicate a problem. “Their numbers are accurate but it depends on the standards,” he said. According to Hobbs, the levels revealed by the testing do not pose a threat to the river.
He conceded that the high levels of arsenic and e-coli were a surprise and would have to be looked into. The e-coli could be the result of animal or bird droppings, he said.
He said there was a drain line from the mill parking lot somewhere along the river bank, but he wasn’t sure whether it was in the areas tested.
He also disputed statements that the lagoons were too dangerous to monitor and were capped. The paper company cleaned them out years ago, according to Hobbs. “They took out all the material and put it in the landfill and capped that,” he said.
He added that the latest report confirms that conditions on the site have been steadily improving.
“It includes the test results for the past 15 years,” he said, “and it shows that the bad stuff keeps going down and the good stuff is going up.”